Film, Radio and TV - 30 |
|
The Social Impactof Television
In this module we'll start our look at the effects — both good and bad — of this pervasive medium. Just how pervasive?
The following provides even more insight into the power of television — and suggests some sobering things to think about.
|
|
TV and Children
TV and Violence
|
|
Before television, children had no idea what most foreign countries
or their peoples looked like, or how they lived. Most exotic animals and fish
were only names in books. Letters, numbers, and words were things that you
started learning when you got to first grade. However, because of television,
most children are now familiar with these things even before they start school.
In countries like the United States where most TV relies on commercials
to exist, viewers pay a price for their "free TV."
We are approaching the 50% level on TV -- half of the programming is taken
up with commercials.
Not all commercials are in breaks from programming; some are in the programs, themselves. This is called product placement, and it may simply be a conspicuous can of Coke, or a cup of Starbuck's coffee held by an actor. Advertisers pay for this visibility.
This advertising cost is the added cost of goods and services that we buy, and it amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
But there are also other "costs."
Critics say that commercials make us materialistic and suggest that happiness and well-being revolve around material possessions. Commercials often pair happiness with products we need to buy.
Examples they give are the simplistic scenarios we often see in commercials. If you have a disappointing love life you can solve the problem by changing to a new brand of toothpaste, a new breath mint, a new brand of jeans, or a different shampoo.
Although you may laugh and assume that these commercial messages don't affect you, advertisers know they do. They don't pay a million-dollars a minute for a commercial on the remote chance that it might increase sales — they know it will.
How many tubes of toothpaste do you have to sell in 30 seconds
to pay for that million-dollar commercial? Such is the power of television.
In
case you wondered what the illustration was all about at the beginning of this
module, the event depicted marked the beginning of some serious research into
the effects of television.
Of course, people were concerned about the effects of television from "day one," but many people just said that they couldn't be much different from the effects of radio.
However, early in TV's history a particular televised event showed that these two forms of electronic mass media were, in fact, quite different.
That
event was a debate between the leading candidates for U.S. president in 1960,
Richard M. Nixon and John F. Kennedy.
Before the debates, most polls showed Kennedy trailing Nixon in popularity. Even with his Boston accent, and Catholic background (both of which some voters objected to) Kennedy moved ahead of Nixon during the debates, and a short time later was elected president.
In the minds of many the debates made the difference. Kennedy
came across as much more at ease and "presidential." Nixon looked
fidgety and ill-at-ease. 
But
the story doesn't end there.
The people who only listened to the debates on the radio had the reverse impression.
To them Nixon seemed more articulate and more in command of the issues. Fortunately, for Kennedy, most people followed the debates on television.
Some people feel that if Nixon had insisted on confining the debates to radio, he would have won the election.
After it became apparent what happened, political consultants quickly started studying the elements of a "winning TV image" and social scientists launched numerous studies into how television affects viewers.
In
the
next module we'll look some of these issues in
more detail.
|
Use Limited to direct Internet access from CyberCollege® or the InternetCampus®
|